|
|||||||
| Huxley (PC) Talk for specifically Huxley on PC related topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Training Grounds
![]() |
ok well here is a link that explain how DDR3 operates, and it says it doubles effectiveness. soo im not sure how it will compare, but im guessing that it will be like in higher ram 8g DDR2= 4G DDR3
Samsung Demonstrates World's First DDR 3 Memory Prototype this is an old page, but explains DDR3, and how it operates.
__________________
CPU- Amd 4600+ duel core 2.4Ghz/Ram- 2g XMS Corsair Ram/GCard- Msi 8800GTX OC version HDD- WD 80g 7500Rpm (Seagate 180G Slave 7500) Last edited by Murvel; 14-09-2007 at 02:04 PM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Training Grounds
![]() |
here is pretty much the only thing i could find on some quality ram testing, but they didnt use vista which kinda defeats the purpose of DDR3 interfacing, xp from what iv gathered does not support it correctly so this wont be 100% accurate, but will add light to the situation.
Memory DDR2-800 DDR3-1600 Latency CL 3-3-3-5 CL 7-8-7-14 Sandra Mem BW int MB/s 7031 7792 Sandra Mem BW FP MB/s 7038 7017 Sandra Mem Latency ns 71 69 Everest Mem Read MB/s 8034 9615 Everest Mem Latency ns 57.8 56.6 Source: DDR2 vs DDR3 tested head to head
__________________
CPU- Amd 4600+ duel core 2.4Ghz/Ram- 2g XMS Corsair Ram/GCard- Msi 8800GTX OC version HDD- WD 80g 7500Rpm (Seagate 180G Slave 7500) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() |
Personally I consider the inquirer more of a tabloid than a reliable source...
here's a good DDR3 round up from Anandtech They both basically support the same idea though: DDR3 is coming along nicely, and certainly much faster than DDR2 did (the micron z9's are proving almost as impressive as their predecessors), but the price/performance ratio just isn't there yet for value let alone budget consumers. Give it another 6 months of fine tuning and you won't be buying DDR2 anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Training Grounds
![]() |
yeah i read that one too, but i wanted some numbers to compare. im already not going to buy DDR2 when i get my new system im getting DDR3 no sense in buying something that is going to out date its self soon.
__________________
CPU- Amd 4600+ duel core 2.4Ghz/Ram- 2g XMS Corsair Ram/GCard- Msi 8800GTX OC version HDD- WD 80g 7500Rpm (Seagate 180G Slave 7500) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() |
Well DDR2-800 and above will all be perfectly adequate for the next few years in my opinion. You might squeeze a few percentage points more from getting incrementally better RAM, but it all comes down to whether you get more additional performance spending that money on a better CPU/GPU instead. Right now DDR2-1066 has a pretty huge price premium as it is (equivalent models are sometimes more than double the price for pretty small performance gains; you could spend that extra $100 on a much better processor and see better improvements), and DDR3 is even higher, and both give decent but not mindblowing performance steps. So ultimately it just comes down to price at the time of upgrading. And I believe there's an assortment of mobos being made that support DDR2 and 3. So basically you really can't go wrong with spending whatever spare change you happen to have on RAM right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Training Grounds
![]() |
the DDR2, and DDR3 mobos have some severe bio errors of course this is some really complex stuff going on to do that. Though like to future proof myself
__________________
CPU- Amd 4600+ duel core 2.4Ghz/Ram- 2g XMS Corsair Ram/GCard- Msi 8800GTX OC version HDD- WD 80g 7500Rpm (Seagate 180G Slave 7500) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Training Grounds
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Where you live.
Posts: 22
![]() |
I still fix peoples computers that have sdram or even fpm lordy my school have computers like that for basic training lol.
__________________
Oh so thats what happened..... Who am I, where am I and why are you wearing boxing gloves? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Training Grounds
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3
![]() |
higher latency numbers do not equal slower ram. DDR3 1333 with a CAS latency of 8 is exactly the same speed as DDR2 667 with a CAS latency of 4. Latency is not the measure of time but rather how many cycles are completed. the DDR3 performs 8 clock cycles in 12ns where the DDR2 performs 4 clock cycles in 12ns. it actually takes the DDR3 1.5ns for one clock cycle compared to 3ns for the DDR2.
DDR3-1333 Speed and Latency Shootout | Tom's Hardware for more info
__________________
[img]http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/6619/ftbhuxley7vy.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
![]() |
Oh nice, that is a very good article and thanks for correcting e, I really did not kow that.
I only just recently upgraded my PC and went for DDR2 simply because the DDR3 latency was so high but now I have read that maybe I should have gone with the DDR3 Doh! Nice read anyway, thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Training Grounds
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Left Side
Posts: 12
![]() |
Get the Gigabyte P35c board, has ddr2 and ddr3 slots!
just grab up some ddr2 9200 or 9600, crank up your cpu clock, and wait for ddr3 prices to fall! Last edited by BeeHay; 07-02-2008 at 04:36 PM. Reason: still waiting for Huxley |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 214
![]() |
Quote:
I got myself 2GB of PC2-8500 and overclocked it to 9600... Runs like a charm and haven't gotten any problems since then (3-4 months, ran several times memtest without errors). |
|
|
|
|